Rubric

Find Rubric
Keep in mind that 40 students have already been assessed using this rubric. Changing it will affect their evaluations.
Source Analysis Paper-Detailed
Source Analysis Paper-Detailed
Criteria Ratings Pts
Quality of Information and Evidence
Provides a brief summary of what is known about the historical period. Provides relevant evidence and examples from the assigned course materials and readings, using examples from all available/assigned materials (does not simply restate the course notes).
threshold: pts
40 pts
Full Marks
30 pts
Some good insights, loses focus in places, uneven use of evidence.
20 pts
Does not answer important parts of the assignment, argumentation uneven, some key evidence missing/uneven.
10 pts
Does not address most of the major objectives of the assignment. Descriptive instead of analytical. Arguments unclear.
0 pts
Fails to answer question, no clear arguments, descriptive rather than analytical.
pts
40 pts
--
Clearly Defined Central Idea
Your thesis is specific, communicating the sources that you will analyze and summarizes the arguments that you will make.
threshold: pts
20 pts
Full Marks
10 pts
Thesis statement unclear, non-contestable and/or does not fully address prompt.
0 pts
Paper does not provide an introduction, historical context missing, no thesis statement.
pts
20 pts
--
Organized Clearly and Logically
Has a defined Introduction and Conclusion. Paragraph division is organized, logical and consistent. Paragraphs begin with a strong statement of purpose. All sentences within paragraph develop an idea.
threshold: pts
10 pts
Full Marks
7 pts
Paragraphs Mostly Organized, Topic Statements Could be Stronger
5 pts
Paragraphs demonstrate internal disorganization and topic "pupose" sentences are missing
3 pts
Introduction and Conclusion present but internal organization lacking, hard to follow organization
0 pts
No Marks
pts
10 pts
--
Academic English: Communicates Ideas Clearly, with Purpose
Uses appropriate word choice. Sentences mean what the writer intends. All sentences contribute to development of ideas and thesis.
threshold: pts
10 pts
Full Marks
7 pts
A few errors in distracting word choice. A few words or sentences do not contribute to writing objectives.
5 pts
Uses words inappropriately (not what they mean). Some sentences are unclear, tangled meanings. Does not edit out ideas that do not contribute to purpose of paper.
3 pts
Paper seriously marred by word choice and lack of clarity. Most sentence required re-reading and/or do not contribute to stated objectives of paper.
0 pts
No Marks
pts
10 pts
--
Academic English: Uses Punctuation, Grammar Appropriately
threshold: pts
10 pts
Full Marks
7 pts
Some distracting errors that take away from essay's impact.
5 pts
Demonstrates a moderate number of errors that detract from impact. Failure to proofread.
3 pts
Paper seriously marred by mistakes in grammar, punctuation and spelling; lack of editing
0 pts
No Marks
pts
10 pts
--
Appropriate Formatting: Name, Date, Instructor, Title, Page Numbers, Citations etc.
Note: failure to include citations for information that requires citation is plagiarism and will result in a zero on the assignment in question. If done correctly, most sentences in your essay require citation!
threshold: pts
10 pts
Full Marks
7 pts
Does not include all required elements of a Chicago-Style paper, but mostly sound
5 pts
Implementation of Chicago-style formatting uneven
3 pts
Uses a documentation style other than Chicago or otherwise demonstrates a lack of understanding of historical documentation requirements
0 pts
No Marks
pts
10 pts
--
Total Points: 100 out of 100